Improving the approaches to the implementation and stages of monitoring the quality of construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2019.41.130-140Keywords:
quality, management, construction, quality monitoringAbstract
The experience of implementation of internal monitoring of the construction quality system based on the process approach is considered. This approach involves highlighting and evaluating the quality of business processes of an individual enterprise and other participants in the construction process, optimizing the flow of their information, logistical, financial and labor resources, developing methods and programs aimed at improving the quality of construction products. It is argued that in order to build a quality system of a construction object, it is necessary not only to have a holistic project for the implementation of the investment-construction process and specifically related to the implementation of design decisions procedures that are part of the strategic planning system for the construction of the object, but also to consider the role, functions and the relationship of each of the participants in the investment and construction process.
In order to check the quality system of construction, it is proposed to describe the basic and auxiliary construction processes and periodic self and external control of their quality, that is, to check the conformity of works and construction materials with design decisions, requirements of state norms and technical conditions, complexity and compliance with the requirements of technology and organization of construction, input control, geodetic control, etc.
Monitoring, which integrates the observation, collection, analysis, processing of information on the state of the object for the purpose of evaluation, forecasting and dissemination of information, will allow to make informed decisions both on the current optimization or adjustment of parameters of the construction process, and on the strategy of further development of the construction enterprise. , optimization of production, financial and investment activity. Monitoring stages have been identified. The first step in the research of the construction quality monitoring system is to determine the information flows between the construction participants, their functional responsibilities and responsibilities. The second stage is the development of goals and planning of the monitoring process, which includes the following procedures: Defining strategic goals and planning; Choice of research methods and methods; Monitoring process; Generalization of data, identification of reasons for deviation of indicators and adjustment of quality of construction process.
References
Arditi, D., & Gunaydin, H. M. (1997), Total quality management in the construction process. International Journal of Project Management, 15, 4, 235-243 [in Great Britain]
Ashokkumar, D. (2014), “Study of quality management in construction industry”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, 3, Special Issue 1, 36-43
Kazaz, A., & Birgonul, M. T. (2005), “Determination of quality level in mass housing projects in Turkey”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(2), 195-202.
Czajkowska A., & Kadłubek M. (2015), “Management of factors affecting quality of processes in construction enterprises”, Polish journal of management studies, 11, 28-38.
Balduk, H.P. (2018) Udoskonalennia vyznachennia yakosti investytsiino-budivelnoho proektu. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system. 34. 13 – 18.
Verhoglyadova, N.I, Rossikhina, O.Ye. (2011), “Upravlinnya yakistyu produktsiyi budivelʹnoho pidpryyemstva yak faktor zabezpechennya yoho konkurentospromozhnosti” available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vchtei_2011_3_46.
Ishikawa, K. (1988), Yaponskiye metody upravleniya kachestvom [Japanese methods of quality management], Economics, Moscow [in Russia]
Harrington, J. (1990), Upravleniye kachestvom v amerikans'kikh korporatsiyakh [Quality Management in American Corporations], Economics, Moscow [in Russia]
Chuprina, Yu. A. (2011), “Advanced method of managing the workplace at the office”, Management of Development of Complex Systems, 7, 135-137.
Tytok, V. (2015) Choice of organization forms for construction of residential objects taking into account interests and abilities of different participants. European Scientific Journal. 11 (8). 21-34.
Tuhai, O.A., Borysova, N.O., Prykhodko, D.O. (2010) Novitni informatsiino-analitychni modeli upravlinnia pidhotovkoiu budivnytstva na zasadakh developmentu. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system» 1. 39-42.
Okrepylov, V.V. (2001) Upravlenye kachestvom: Ucheb. dlia vuzov. - 2-e yzd. – M.: Эkonomyka.
Tsai, T.N, Hrabovyi, PH., Balshakov, V.A. (1999) Orhanyzatsyia stroytelnoho proyzvodstva. Uchebnyk dlia vuzov. -M.:Yzd. ASV.
DSTUISO 9001-95 Systemy yakosti. Model zabezpechennia yakosti v protsesi proektuvannia, rozroblennia, vyrobnytstva, montazhu ta obsluhovuvannia
Bushuev, S.D., Bushueva, N.S. (2006) Upravlenye proektamy. Osnovы professyonalnыkh znanyi y systema otsenky kompetentnosty proektnыkh menedzherov.-K.: IRIDIUM
Bielienkova, O.Iu. (2017) Tsinoutvorennia u budivnytstvi: K.: KNUBA.
Krykun, K.V., Riazanov, A.S., Oliferuk S.L. (2013) Tekhniko-ekonomichnii analiz i otsinka rivnia vytrat vyrobnychykh resursiv na zabezpechennia yakosti u budivnytstvi. Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia. 48. 175-178.
Iemelianova, O.M. & Tytok, V.V. (2019) Metodychni osnovy upravlinnia yakistiu budivelnoi produktsii. Kompleksne zabezpechennia yakosti tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv ta system (KZIaTPS – 2019): materialy tez dopovidei. – Chernihiv: ChNTU, 2. 272-273.
Halunka O.D., Hrytsenko O.S., Sultanov Z.H.O. Systema yakosti v vprovadzhenni innovatsii na budivelnomu pidpryiemstvi. Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Ekonomiko-upravlinski ta informatsiino-analitychni novatsii v budivnytstvi». – Kyiv, Vydavnytstvo Lira-K, 2019.– 312 s. C/88-89.
Pokolenko, V., Malykhina, O., Chuprina, Yu., Gorbach, M. & Voloshyna, T. (2017). Innovative technology of estimation of quality of management of building contracting enterprises. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 32, 146 – 152.
Chupryna, Yurii (2013) Suchasni orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichni modeli upravlinnia yakistiu u budivnytstvi.- Dysertatsiia kand. tekhn. nauk: 05.23.08, Kyiv. nats. un-t bud-va i arkhit
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 N. Nikohosyan, L. Litvinenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
