Seistenism – a new look at the concept of sustainable building

Authors

Keywords:

seistenism, sustainable development, construction, construction enterprises, ecological and economic parameters, economic assessment, competitiveness, competitive advantages, innovations, innovative products

Abstract

The article examines the current state of the implementation of sustainable development approaches in construction enterprises and construction projects, and also considers construction from the perspective of Seistenism.

Seistenism is a new concept in economic development and construction that focuses on sustainable, efficient and technologically integrated construction practices. This concept combines building principles and approaches from various disciplines, including architecture, construction and civil engineering, ecology, environmental economics and environmental science, to create a structure that is not only functionally and aesthetically appealing, but also environmentally responsible and sustainable. to changing climatic conditions, while ensuring economic efficiency and minimal impact on the environment. Key elements of Seistenism include the use of renewable materials, energy-efficient designs, and integrated smart technologies to optimize building performance. The concept advocates a holistic approach to construction, which takes into account the entire life cycle of a building, from design and construction to operation and final dismantling of building structures and liquidation of the facility. This approach aims to minimize the impact of buildings on the environment, reduce resource consumption and promote the health and well-being of residents. In addition, Seistenism emphasizes the importance of community involvement and the inclusion of local cultural and environmental contexts in the design process. By fostering collaboration between stakeholders, including architects, engineers, developers and the community, systemicism involves creating buildings that are not only sustainable, but also culturally relevant and economically viable. Applying systemic principles to construction can lead to significant progress in the industry, fostering innovation and encouraging the widespread adoption of sustainable practices. Ultimately, Seistenism represents an advanced approach to construction that aligns with global efforts to combat climate change and promote sustainable development.

References

Verhaar, H. The Age of Sustainalism: The Connected Lighting Revolution. URL: https://www.ieta.org/resources/COP%2023/Side-Event-Presentations/SE19_RTCC-Philips%20Lighting%20-%20COP23%2010Nov2017.pdf (data zvernennia 15.01.2024).

Sustainalism: An Integrated Socio-Economic-Environmental Model to Address Sustainable Development and Sustainability. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372203198_Sustainalism_An_Integrated_Socio-Economic-Environmental_Model_to_Address_Sustainable_Development_and_Sustainability (data zvernennia 15 .01. 2024).

Ekolohichnyi vymir yevropeiskoi intehratsii. URL: https://www.rac.org.ua/priorytety/ekologichnyy-vymir-evropeyskoyi-integratsiyi?gclid=CjwKCAiAzJOtBhALEiwAtwj8tvSklFZVdHXJSQ4skPUW_Kp7Sc16yp7aNAWAjjy-RDoPpYUjV7FoLhoCQBAQAvD_BwE

Alternatyvni dzherela enerhii: pliusy ta minusy. URL: https://www.bezpeka-shop.com/ua/blog/poleznye-sovety/alternativnye-istochniki-energii-plyusy-i-minusy/

Shcho take enerhoefektyvnist i yak yii vprovadzhuvaty. URL: https://ecoaction.org.ua/shcho-take-ee.html?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiAzJOtBhALEiwAtwj8tnLwqU0bWXPv30NqywSA3R_BsQYA1WTd4zNlOuOngQBi_sR5CFmZpxoC35wQAvD_BwE

Rozvytok pidpryiemstva na ekoloho-ekonomichnykh zasadakh: [Elektronnyi resurs] monohrafiia / [Shvydanenko H.O., Kryvoruchkina O.V., Matukova D.H.]. - K.: KNEU, 2017. - 184 s. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/197268892.pdf

Jayne, T.; Snapp, S.; Place, F.; Sitko, N. Sustainable agricultural intensification in an era of rural transformation in Africa. Glob. Food Secur. 2019, 20, 105–113.

Dadamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Morone, P.; Rosa, P.; Sassanelli, C.; Settembre-Blundo, D.; Shen, Y. Bioeconomy of Sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications. Sustainability 2022, 14, 200.

Stephenson, P.J.; Damerell, A. Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10643.

Zheng, H.W.; Shen, G.Q.; Wang, H. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat Int. 2014, 41, 272–279.

Morris, R.; Alonso, I.; Jefferson, R.; Kirby, K. The creation of compensatory habitat—Can it secure sustainable development? J. Nat. Conserv. 2006, 14, 106–116.

Kang, J.; Martinez, C.M.J.; Johnson, C. Minimalism as a sustainable lifestyle: Its behavioral representations and contributions to emotional well-being. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 802–813.

Vogel, S.M.; Vasudev, D.; Ogutu, J.O.; Taek, P.; Berti, E.; Goswami, V.R.; Kaelo, M.; Buitenwerf, R.; Munk, M.; Li, W.; et al. Identifying sustainable coexistence potential by integrating willingness-to-coexist with habitat suitability assessments. Biol. Conserv. 2023, 279, 109935.

Moslem, S.; Ghorbanzadeh, O.; Blaschke, T.; Duleba, S. Analysing Stakeholder Consensus for a Sustainable Transport Development Decision by the Fuzzy AHP and Interval AHP. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3271.

Transportni trendy 2023 u sviti ta v Ukraini. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/press-room/expert/transportation-trends.html

Holden, E.; Banister, D.; Gössling, S.; Gilpin, G.; Linnerud, K. Grand Narratives for sustainable mobility: A conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 65, 101454.

Burbules, N.C.; Fan, G.; Repp, P. Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geogr. Sustain. 2020, 1, 93–97.

Ardoin, N.M.; Bowers, A.W. Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educ. Res. Rev. 2020, 31, 100353.

Nousheen, A.; Zai, S.A.Y.; Waseem, M.; Khan, S.A. Education for sustainable development (ESD): Effects of sustainability education on pre-service teachers attitude towards sustainable development (SD). J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119537.

Terán-Yépez, E.; Marín-Carrillo, G.M.; Casado-Belmonte, M.D.P.; Capobianco-Uriarte, M.D.L.M. Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119742.

Glass, L.-M.; Newig, J. Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions? Earth Syst. Gov. 2019, 2, 100031.

Visseren-Hamakers, I.J.; Razzaque, J.; McElwee, P.; Turnhout, E.; Kelemen, E.; Rusch, G.M.; Fernández-Llamazares, Á.; Chan, I.; Lim, M.; Islar, M.; et al. Transformative governance of biodiversity: Insights for sustainable development. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 53, 20–28.

Chowdhury, M.H.; Quaddus, M.A. Supply chain sustainability practices and governance for mitigating sustainability risk and improving market performance: A dynamic capability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123521.

Lombardi, R.; Trequattrini, R.; Cuozzo, B.; Cano-Rubio, M. Corporate corruption prevention, sustainable governance and legislation: First exploratory evidence from the Italian scenario. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 666–675.

Hörisch, J.; Schaltegger, S.; Freeman, R.E. Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 124097.

Cambridge Institute for Sustainability. Developing the EUs ‘Competitive Sustainability for a Resilient Recovery and Dynamic Growth; The University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability: Cambridge, UK, 2020.

CIB and UNEP-IETC (2002), Agenda 21 for Sustainable Construction in Developing Countries, CSIR Building and Construction Technology, Pretoria.

Abd Jamil, A.H. and Fathi, M.S. (2016), “The integration of lean construction and sustainable construction: a stakeholder perspective in analyzing sustainable lean construction strategies in Malaysia”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 100, pp. 634-643.

Ismail, F.Z., Halog, A. and Smith, C. (2017), “How sustainable is disaster resilience?: an overview of sustainable construction approach in post-disaster housing reconstruction”, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 555-572.

Oke, A.E., Aigbavboa, C.O. and Semenya, K. (2017), “Energy savings and sustainable construction: examining the advantages of nanotechnology”, Energy Procedia, Vol. 142, pp. 3839-3843.

Aghimien, D.O., Aigbavboa, C.O. and Thwala, W.D. (2019), “Microscoping the challenges of sustainable construction in developing countries”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, doi: 10.1108/JEDT-01-2019-0002

Hill, R.C. and Bowen, P.A. (1997), “Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 223-239.

Hall, M. and Purchase, D. (2006), “Building or bodging? attitudes to sustainability in UK public sector housing construction development”, Sustainable Development, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 205-218.

Koranda, C., Chong, O., Kim, C., Chou, J.S. and Kim, C. (2012), “An investigation of the applicability of sustainability and lean concepts to small construction projects”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 699-707.

Shurrab, J., Hussain, M. and Khan, M. (2019), “Green and sustainable practices in the construction industry: a confirmatory factor analysis approach”, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 1063-1086.

Agyekum-Mensah, G., Knight, A. and Coffey, C.H. (2012), “4Es and 4 Poles model of sustainability: redefining sustainability in the built environment”, Structural Survey, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 426-442.

Shcho take zelene budivnytstvo ta chomu tse vazhlyvo? URL: https://ukraineinvest.gov.ua/news/31-05-22-2/

Chala V.S., Orlovska Yu.V., Hlushchenko A.V. Yevropeiski praktyky investuvannia zelenoho budivnytstva: Pidruchnyk D.: PDABA. 2023. – 148 s.

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Skakun, V. (2024). Seistenism – a new look at the concept of sustainable building. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 1(53), 174–184. Retrieved from http://ways.knuba.edu.ua/article/view/311168