Features of construction and investment projects as objects of organizational management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2022.49(2).320-333

Keywords:

construction and investment projects, organizational management, resource coordination, risk management, digital technologies, BIM, efficiency, strategic planning

Abstract

The features of construction and investment projects as objects of organizational management are characterized by their high complexity, multi-component nature, and interdependence of implementation stages. Such projects integrate the interests of various participants: investors, contractors, clients, governmental authorities, and local communities, which necessitates the establishment of a clear organizational management structure and a resource coordination system. Construction and investment projects encompass a wide range of functions – from design, procurement of materials and resources, logistics, and construction works to commissioning and financial control. Effective management of these projects requires not only monitoring timelines and budgets but also ensuring the quality of construction processes, minimizing risks, and adapting to changes in the external environment, including economic, social, and regulatory factors.

A key aspect of management is the integration of modern information and digital technologies, such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), project management systems, and ERP platforms, which enhance transparency, accuracy, and decision-making efficiency. An essential component is the application of analytical methods for risk assessment and resource management effectiveness, which ensures timely response to deviations and process optimization. The competitiveness of companies in the construction sector directly depends on their ability to adapt to changing market conditions, integrate financial, technological, and human resources, and ensure the sustainable development of project initiatives.

As a result of systematic analysis, it has been determined that the features of construction and investment projects require the development of comprehensive organizational and management mechanisms that take into account the multidisciplinary nature of projects, the necessity to integrate public and private interests, and the use of innovative management technologies. The conclusions presented may serve as a theoretical basis for further research in construction project management and as a practical guide for companies aiming to enhance management decision-making, minimize risks, and ensure timely execution of construction and investment projects.

References

Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), 699–725. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00097-8

Kim, Y.-W., Kang, G.-J., & Lee, J.-W. (2016). Improving Construction Project Management through Lean Implementation. Sustainability, 8(12), 1234. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1234

Miles, M. E., Berens, G. L., Weiss, M. A., & Eppli, M. J. (2015). Real Estate Development: Principles and Process. Washington: Urban Land Institute. 720 p. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://nnj.uli.org/real-estate-development-principles-process-textbook/

Masters, K. (2019). Challenges in Infrastructure Development: Policy and Management Aspects. Report. Washington: Competitive Enterprise Institute. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://cei.org

Khristenko, E. A. Project Management for Facility Constructions. Educational publication. Valparaíso: University of Valparaíso, [year not specified]. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://surl.lu/cwfpil

Kim, Y.-W., Kang, G.-J., & Lee, J.-W. (2016). Improving Construction Project Management through Lean Implementation. Sustainability, 8(12), 1234. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1234

Smith, N. J., Merna, T., & Jobling, P. (2014). Managing Risk in Construction Projects (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 296 p. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118837330

Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Newtown Square: PMI. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://ibimone.com/PMBOK%207th%20Edition%20(iBIMOne.com).pdf

Technium Social Sciences Journal. Electronic journal. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/

Chupryna, Yu. A., Bolebrukh, O. S., Rovenskyi, A. Ye., Derkach, A. Ye., & Hulyaiev, D. A. (2021). Analysis of Systems for Making Economic and Managerial Decisions of the Enterprise Business Portfolio. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, (1), 64–72. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/frvu_2021_1_10

Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. 786 p. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://surli.cc/elxtfl

Turner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2006). Choosing appropriate project managers: Matching their leadership style to the type of project. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 5–15. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700202

Chupryna, Kh. M., Chupryna, Yu. A., Borodavko, M. V., & Hrabchak, D. V. (2020). Structural-Cognitive Modeling of the Processes of Managing the Intellectualization of Construction Enterprises. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, (5(228)), 89–98.

Hendrickson, C. (2008). Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. 430 p. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.systematic.sk/web/media/Chris%20Hendrickson_Project_Management_for_Construction.pdf

Published

2022-04-11

How to Cite

Stelmakh, O., Molodko, O., Shtyl, A., & Shcherban, B. (2022). Features of construction and investment projects as objects of organizational management. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 2(49), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2022.49(2).320-333