Evolution of scientific approaches to detecting the causes of destructive processes within the organizational and technological system of construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(2).42-51Keywords:
destructive processes, construction production, organizational and technological system, digital transformation, risks, sustainable development, adaptive management, evolution of approachesAbstract
Construction is one of the most complex and risky areas of economic activity, where numerous technological, organizational, economic and social factors are combined. In such conditions, the occurrence of destructive processes is inevitable, but the effectiveness of the industry depends on the ability to detect, analyze and neutralize them in a timely manner. Destructive phenomena manifest themselves in the form of planning failures, incoherence of participants' actions, overspending of resources, technological violations and a decrease in the quality of the final result. Their nature is systemic, which requires an interdisciplinary approach to diagnostics and management. Scientific approaches to the study of the causes of destruction in construction production have undergone significant evolution – from intuitive and descriptive methods to analytical and digitally-oriented management models. If in the past attention was paid mainly to economic and technical aspects of efficiency, now the issues of system management of stability, adaptability and digital interaction of components of the organizational and technological structure are gaining increasing importance. Digitalization technologies play a significant role in the development of modern methods of analyzing destructive processes – in particular, BIM, ERP, CRM and Big Data Analytics systems. They create the opportunity not only to record deviations, but also to predict their occurrence by analyzing accumulated data in real time. Static models have been replaced by cognitive and analytical systems capable of self-learning and adaptation, which significantly increases the accuracy of management decisions. The study focuses on the need to transition from reactive strategies to predictive and analytical management, when the causes of destruction are determined not after the fact, but in the process of forming management decisions. It was found that the key factors of destructive processes are insufficient integration of information systems, organizational inertia, lack of managerial competencies and the absence of a unified methodology for assessing the sustainability of production systems. A conceptual model is proposed in which construction production is considered as an open system that constantly interacts with a dynamic external environment. This approach allows classifying destructions by their source of origin – technological, economic, social or informational – and determining the nature of the relationships between them.
References
Flyvbjerg, B. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 208 p.
Аметепей S.O., et al. A bibliometric review of the trends of construction digital technologies: BIM, automation and blockchain. Buildings. 2024. Vol. 14, No. 9. Art. 2729. DOI: 10.3390/buildings14092729
Loosemore, M., Raftery, J., Reilly, C., & Higgon, D. Risk Management in Projects. London : Routledge, 2006. 284 p.
Zou P.X.W., Zhang G., Wang J. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management. 2007. Volume 25, Issue 6. Р. 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001.
Sullivan E., Ward P.M. Sustainable housing applications and policies for low-income self-build and housing rehab. Habitat International, 2012, Volume 36, Issue 2, P. 312-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.009.
Anvari B., Angeloudis P., Ochieng W.Y. A multi-objective GA-based optimisation for holistic Manufacturing, transportation and Assembly of precast construction. Automation in Construction, 2016, Volume 71, Part 2, P. 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.007.
Федун І.Л., Чуприна Ю.А. Інструментарій державного регулювання будівництвом. Будівельне виробництво, 2019, 66, 87-91.
Чуприна Ю.А., Чуприна Х.М., Бородавко М.В., Гавріков Д.О. Стратегії реконфігурації бізнес-процесів будівельних підприємств. Управління розвитком складних систем. 2020. № 41. С. 169 – 174.
Demian P. BIM Implementation in Post-War Reconstruction of Ukraine. Buildings. 2024. Т. 14, № 11. Р. 3495. DOI: 10.3390/buildings14113495
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2024). Digital Transformation and Resilience in Post-War Reconstruction. URL: https://www.undp.org.
Khosrowshahi F., Arayici Y. Roadmap for implementation of BIM in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2012. Vol. 19, No. 6. P. 610–635.
Das A., Das R.S., Das K. Performance enhancement of a liquid desiccant absorber with triangular corrugated structured packing. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, Volume 45, 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103677.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).