Architectural vulnerability during wars, natural disasters, and technological threats as a factor in the loss of sacred heritage

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(2).118-131

Keywords:

sacred architecture, architectural vulnerability, cultural heritage, war, natural disasters, technological threats, digital restoration, spiritual continuity

Abstract

Sacred architecture is one of the most valuable carriers of humanity’s spiritual and cultural memory, yet it demonstrates the greatest vulnerability during periods of war, natural disasters, and technological threats. The destruction of temples, monasteries, and sanctuaries leads not only to the loss of unique architectural forms but also disrupts the spiritual continuity of cultural identity. Architectural vulnerability under such conditions is considered a multifactorial process, in which physical, natural, social, and symbolic factors interact.

Wars test not only the structural integrity of buildings but also the spiritual resilience of societies. The deliberate destruction of sacred sites becomes an act of cultural genocide aimed at erasing collective memory. Natural disasters, in turn, reveal the material aging of temples and the technological limitations of past eras, while technological threatspollution, vibrations, and climate fluctuationscause hidden yet continuous structural degradation. The study emphasizes that the preservation of sacred heritage has both material and spiritual dimensions. Physical restoration of temples is impossible without resacralization of the spacerestoring its original meaning through community participation, ritual practices, and the revival of historical memory. Several analytical models for assessing architectural resilience are proposed, including an integral vulnerability index, an equation of the structural-semantic energy of a temple, and a model of spiritual regeneration.

Particular attention is given to the role of digital technologies3D scanning, laser photogrammetry, and digital twinsthat make it possible to record the condition of sacred structures and create precise virtual replicas to preserve them in the event of destruction. Thus, digital representation becomes a new form of memory that extends the life of architecture in virtual space. Architectural vulnerability emerges not only as a characteristic of physical structure but also as an indicator of a society’s spiritual maturity. Where preservation occurseven in digital formculture demonstrates its responsibility and awareness of its historical continuity. The preservation of sacred architecture is, therefore, an act of spiritual resistance that affirms humanity’s dignity and its capacity for renewal despite destruction.

References

Jeleński T. Practices of Built Heritage Post-Disaster Reconstruction for Resilient Cities. Buildings. 2018. Vol. 8, № 4. Art. 53. DOI:10.3390/buildings8040053.

Themistocleous, K., Evagorou, E., Mettas, Ch., Hadjimitsis, D. (2022). The use of digital twin models to document cultural heritage monuments. Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications XIII, 13. DOI: 10.1117/12.2636332.

Cuca, B., Zaina, F., Tapete, D. Monitoring of Damages to Cultural Heritage across Europe Using Remote Sensing and Earth Observation: Assessment of Scientific and Grey Literature. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(15), 3748. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153748

Norberg-Schulz Ch. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli, 1980. 216 p.

Fassbinder S. Preventive solutions for sensitive materials of cultural heritage. URL: https://www.sensmat.eu/

Lourenço P.B., Roca P., Modena C., Agrawal Sh Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions: Possibilities of numerical and experimental techniques. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference. New Delhi, India (6-8 November 2006). VOLUME 1. URL: https://repositorium.uminho.pt/server/api/core/bitstreams/12e11a68-baf1-44f3-a419-00536f238186/content

Andres B.; Betlej I.; Nowacka M.; Boruszewski P. Analysis of the Factors Leading to the Degradation of Wooden Cultural Heritage Based on the Example of a 16th-Century Sacred Monument in Poland. Applied Sciences. 2024. Vol. 14, № 24. Art. 11475. DOI:10.3390/app142411475.

Sabbioni C., Cassar M., Brimblecombe P., Lefevre R.A. Vulnerability of Cultural Heritage to Climate Change. Strasbourg, 2008. URL: https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/majorhazards/activites/2009/ravello15-16may09/ravello_apcat2008_44_sabbioni-jan09_en.pdf

Chupryna I., Ryzhakova G., Chupryna K., Tormosov R., Gonchar V. Designing a toolset for the formalized evaluation and selection of reengineering projects to be implemented at an enterprise. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2022, 1(13-115), 6–19.

Sesana E.; Campopiano G.; Orlando S.; D'Amico F. Climate change impacts on cultural heritage: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2021. Vol. 12, № 3. DOI:10.1002/wcc.710. URL: https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.710

Чуприна Ю.А. Залучення прикладних переваг bim-технологій до методики і практики формування життєвого циклу проектів у складі державних цільових програм, які втілюються будівельним кластером. Економіка та держава. 2019. № 3. С. 67–70. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6806.2019.3.67

Blasi C.; Coïsson E. The effects of environmental temperature on historic stone-masonry structures. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. London: Taylor & Francis, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439828229.ch146

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

HYRIA, V. . (2025). Architectural vulnerability during wars, natural disasters, and technological threats as a factor in the loss of sacred heritage. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 2(56), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(2).118-131