Ensuring system integration of participants in the investment and construction process, including investors, contractors, and stakeholders

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(2).194-205

Keywords:

system integration, investment and construction process, investor, contractor, stakeholders, digital convergence, information interaction, managerial alignment

Abstract

System integration of participants in the investment and construction process is a key condition for the efficiency of modern projects operating within a complex, multi-level environment characterized by numerous financial, technological, and social interconnections. Its essence lies in the creation of a unified informational and managerial environment where the investor, contractor, and stakeholders act according to a coordinated decision-making logic, jointly set goals, monitor results, and ensure transparency in collaboration. Such integration goes beyond ordinary coordination, evolving into a structured mechanism for harmonizing strategic, tactical, and operational actions.

In modern construction practice, system integration is implemented through a combination of institutional mechanisms and digital platforms  –  BIM, CDE, and ERP –  which ensure end-to-end information exchange, risk management, and synchronization of activities in real time. The investor forms the financial and analytical framework for management, the contractor is responsible for technical implementation, while stakeholders establish the regulatory and social context that influences the project’s pace and quality. Balance between these levels is achieved through a unified planning system, KPI alignment, digital interaction standards (ISO 19650), and adaptive monitoring mechanisms.

The integration model ensures dynamic alignment between the investor’s strategic priorities, the contractor’s operational processes, and stakeholder expectations. It contributes to the elimination of conflicts of interest, reduces coordination delays, and strengthens transparency and trust among participants. The key principles include data openness, shared responsibility, digital compatibility, and adaptability to external change. Digital convergence that combines CDE, ERP, and BIM systems forms the basis for integrated management, where each participant has a clearly defined role, access to relevant information, and analytical tools for decision-making. Within such an environment, management evolves from reactive to predictive –  decisions are made based on analytics and scenario modeling.

This approach enables construction enterprises to achieve resilience, efficiency, and predictability in project implementation of any scale or complexity. It represents a transition toward a new paradigm of coordinated management, where technology, data, and collaboration merge into a unified system of continuous improvement and strategic control.

References

Song J., Munyinda M., Adu Sarfo P. Examining the impact of risk management practices on sustainable project performance in the construction industry: the role of stakeholder engagement. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2025, 11: 1575827. DOI:10.3389/fbuil.2025.1575827.

Xia N., Zou P. X. W., Griffin M. A., Wang X., Zhong R. Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: a systematic literature review and future research agendas. International Journal of Project Management. 2018. Vol. 36, № 5. P. 701–715. DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.006

Decoding ISO 19650 Through Process Modelling for Information Management. Buildings. 2023. Vol. 15, № 3, Art. 431. DOI:10.3390/buildings15030431.

Kerzner H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

Лисенко М.В., Харченко Ю.А. Удосконалення системи планування обсягів виробництва на промисловому підприємстві. Економіка і регіон. 2012. № 1. С. 141-146. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/econrig_2012_1_24

Mintzberg H. Five basic parts of the organization. URL: https://projectinspire.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/1979_Parts-of-the-Org_Mintzberg.pdf

Mintzberg H. The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979. 512 p.

Koskela L. Management of Production in Construction: a theoretical view. 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999. Pp. 241–252. URL: https://www.iglc.net/papers/details/76

Chernyshev, D., Ryzhakova, G., Honcharenko, T., Chupryna, I., & Reznik, N. (2023). Digital administration of the project based on the concept of smart construction. In V. Kreinovich, S. Thach, N. Nguyen, & V. Reddy (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 495, pp. 1316–1331.

David P. A. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75, № 2. Pp. 332–337.

Чуприна Ю.А. Побудова концепції інтеграції підприємств стейкхолдерів до складу будівельного кластеру. Формування ринкових відносин в Україні. 2019, №1 (212). C. 85-91.

Sacks R., Koskela L., Dave B. A., Owen R. Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modeling in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2010. Vol. 136, № 9. Pp. 968–980. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943 7862.0000203.

Koskela L., Talebi S., Tezel A., Tzortzopoulos P. Building Information Modeling and Lean Construction. Building Information Modeling: Shared Modeling, Mutual Data, the New Art of Building. Wiley, 2023. Pp. 121–146. DOI:10.1002/9781394264933.

Walzer, A.N., Tan, T., Graser, K., & Hall, D.M. Bug or feature? Institutional misalignments between construction technology and venture capital. Construction Management and Economics, 2025, 43(2), 130-152. Article 2401818. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2024.2401818

Кальніченко О. В., Чернова М. Л. Особливості управління будівельними проєктами в нестабільній економіко політичній ситуації в Україні. Управління розвитком складних систем. 2015. № 22. C. 54–60.

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

TSYMBALYSTY, Y. . (2025). Ensuring system integration of participants in the investment and construction process, including investors, contractors, and stakeholders. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 2(56), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(2).194-205