Assessment of trends and factors influencing the diversification of activities in the construction sector

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(2).156-169

Keywords:

diversification of activities, construction sector, institutional factors, digital transformation, BIM technologies, strategic adaptation, resource elasticity, competitiveness

Abstract

In today’s context of economic instability and global transformations, the construction industry faces the need for a profound restructuring of its development strategies. One of the key tools for ensuring the resilience and competitiveness of enterprises is the diversification of activities, which not only minimizes risks but also creates new growth vectors. This study focuses on assessing the trends and factors influencing the diversification process in the construction sector, as well as determining the role of digital technologies and the regulatory environment in this transformation. The article systematizes the main directions of diversification – horizontal, vertical, functional, and regional – and analyzes their interaction with both external and internal determinants. It examines the influence of public policy, institutional frameworks, technological innovation, and the level of digital maturity of enterprises on the intensity of diversification processes. It has been established that modern companies are shifting from narrowly specialized business models to multifunctional structures capable of operating simultaneously in construction, asset management, energy efficiency, and digital services. Particular attention is paid to the impact of digital transformation, especially the implementation of BIM, IoT, AI, ERP, and PMIS systems, which act as catalysts for functional diversification. The study proposes analytical formulas for measuring the level of institutional attractiveness, digital penetration, and adaptive elasticity of enterprises, allowing for a quantitative assessment of their diversification potential. It has been revealed that sustainable diversification is possible only when a balance is achieved between internal resources (financial, human, digital) and external challenges (economic, regulatory, technological). The findings indicate that diversification has evolved from a defensive response to an active strategic mechanism for development, where flexibility, analytics, and digital integration serve as key factors of long-term efficiency. The concept proposed in the article allows diversification to be viewed not merely as a reaction to external challenges but as a proactive tool for shaping the future of construction companies within the digital economy.

References

Кузьмін А. В., Литвишко О. М. Диверсифікація послуг будівельних підприємств в умовах економічної турбулентності. Будівництво та менежмент, 2023. № 2. С. 45–57.

Ulubeyli S., Arslan V., Doğan E. Diversification strategy of construction companies: benefits and risks. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Applied Sciences (CUMHURIYET), 2023. Р. 184-191. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370844505_Diversification_Strategy_of_Construction_Companies_Benefits_and_Risks

North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 152 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

Olaseni, I. (2022). Optimizing construction project delivery using BIM for real-time design, scheduling, and cost integration. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. 7. 759-776. DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2022.7.2.0258.

Мних О. Б., Сорока О. А. Маркетингові дослідження: навч. посіб. Львів: НУ «Львівська політехніка», 2004. 283 с. URL: https://vlp.com.ua/files/sekcia_1.pdf

Шевчук Ю. Українські міста готові будувати сталe майбутнє. URL: https://euea-energyagency.org/uk/novyny-ta-podiyi/yuliya-shevchuk-ukrayinski-mista-gotovi-buduvaty-stale-majbutnye/

Чуприна Ю.А., Болебрух О.С., Ровенський А.Є., Деркач А.Є., Гуляєв Д.А. Аналіз систем прийняття економіко–управлінських рішень бізнес–портфеля підприємства. Формування ринкових відносин в Україні. 2021. № 1. С. 64-72.

Gunduz M., Naji K. K., Al Henzab F., Al Hababi H. A Systematic Review of the Digital Transformation of the Building Construction Industry: global trends across pre construction, конструкцію та експлуатацію. IEEE Access, 2024. Vol. 12. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365934

Федорчук В. Terra incognita української економіки. Чотири висновки з дослідження середнього бізнесу Інституту економічних досліджень. URL: https://surl.li/picxeo

Чуприна Ю., Федорова Я., Рижакова Г., Петренко Г., Гриненко І., Ніколаєва М. Аналітичні компоненти та базові функціонали управління підприємством в сучасній системі будівельного девелопменту. Управління розвитком складних систем. 2021. №47. С. 130–137

Бородіна О. Базові тренди повоєнної трансформації економіки України: бюджетна децентралізація, індустрія 4.0, регіональний енергоменеджмент. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 6, no. 1. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/jouinnsus_2022_6_1_6

Uygur, M.R., & Peyravi, B. (2025). Business resilience and strategic responses in Ukraine and Lithuania during the Russia-Ukraine conflict: insights from the energy, agriculture, and manufacturing sectors. Business: Theory and Practice, 26(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2025.22164

Soluk J. (2022). Organisations’ resources and external shocks: Exploring digital innovation in family firms. Industry and Innovation. Vol. 29, No 6, pp. 792–824. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2022.2065971

Boutros M.B., El Hajj C., Jawad D., Martínez Montes G. Diffusion of ERP in the Construction Industry: An ERP Modules Approach: Case Study of Developing Countries. Buildings, 2024, Vol. 14 (10), Art. 3224. DOI:10.3390/buildings14103224.

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

BOSHTAN , A. . (2025). Assessment of trends and factors influencing the diversification of activities in the construction sector. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 2(56), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(2).156-169