Identification of problems and risks in the implementation of diversification strategies under conditions of a volatile economic environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2026.57(1).64-78

Keywords:

diversification strategy, economic volatility, macroeconomic risks, portfolio imbalance, internal dysfunctions, strategic integration, risk management, construction sector

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study of the problems and risks associated with the implementation of diversification strategies in the construction sector under conditions of a volatile economic environment. It is substantiated that diversification, as an instrument of strategic development during periods of economic instability, acquires a dual nature: on the one hand, it serves as a mechanism for reducing dependence on individual market segments; on the other hand, it generates an increased level of systemic risks. It is determined that macroeconomic factors—such as changes in GDP, inflationary fluctuations, currency volatility, the key interest rate, regulatory instability, and political risks-form a complex multifactor matrix influencing strategic decisions regarding diversification.

The mechanism of transformation of external risks into internal strategic losses through cascade effects, portfolio imbalance, and disruption of investment synchronization is revealed. Particular attention is paid to internal organizational dysfunctions as a latent factor that blocks diversification initiatives. It is shown that strategic misalignment of objectives, information inconsistency, functional inertia, and resource inadequacy are capable of neutralizing the benefits of diversification even under relatively stable macroeconomic conditions.

Formalized analytical approaches to assessing macroeconomic and internal risks, as well as models for the quantitative determination of portfolio imbalance, are proposed. The necessity of transitioning from static risk assessment methods to multi-layered adaptive risk management systems integrated into the strategic framework of the enterprise is substantiated.

It is proven that the implementation of a digitally supported risk management system incorporating scenario modeling, Markov processes, FMEA analysis, Bayesian networks, and adaptive weighted assessment enhances the resilience of the diversification portfolio and reduces the likelihood of strategic bias. A conclusion is formulated regarding the need for the systematic integration of risk-oriented management into the process of developing and implementing diversification strategies as a prerequisite for the long-term sustainability of an enterprise.

References

Кириченко С. О., Кацевич М. М. Управління ризиками фінансової діяльності в будівельній галузі. Бізнес Інформ, 2024, № 10, С. 175–181. DOI:10.32983/2222 4459 2024 10 175 181

Руденко О. В. Управління процесом диверсифікації діяльності підприємства: магістерська робота. Дніпро: ДДАЕУ, 2023. 74 с. URL: https://dspace.dsau.dp.ua/bitstream/123456789/8946/1/Руденко%20О.В..pdf

П’ятночка Б. Теоретичні аспекти дослідження інвестиційної привабливості будівельних підприємств. Економіка та суспільство, 2024, 69. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-69-127.

Атаєва О.А., Ніколашин А.О., Тимошик Н.С. Стратегічне управління ризиками на підприємстві: аналіз та зменшення негативних впливів. Ефективна економіка. 2024. № 2. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2024.2.52

Дзюбіна А.В., Боцман Ю.С. Напрями мінімізації ризиків у сфері будівницва. Ефективна економіка. 2018. № 11. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2018.11.70

Лівшиць В.Я. Аналіз стратегії диверсифікації діяльності українських металургійних підприємств на міжнародних ринках (на матеріалі компанії Метінвест). Actual Problems of Economics, 2024, № 11 (281). С. 14–22. DОІ: 10.32752/1993-6788-2024-1-281-14-22

Khodabakhshian A., Puolitaival T., Kestle L. Deterministic and Probabilistic Risk Management Approaches in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review and Comparative Analysis. Buildings, 2023, 13(5), 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051312.

Rastayesh S., Bahrebar S., Blaabjerg F., Zhou D., Wang H., Dalsgaard S.J. A System Engineering Approach Using FMEA and Bayesian Network for Risk Analysis-A Case Study. Sustainability, 2020, 12(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010077.

Markowitz H. M. Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x

López de Prado M. Building Diversified Portfolios that Outperform Out of Sample. Journal of Portfolio Management, 2016, 42, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.4.059

Akselrod R., Shpakov A., Ryzhakova G., Honcharenko T., Chupryna Iu., Shpakova Н. Integration of Data Flows of the Construction Project Life Cycle to Create a Digital Enterprise Based on Building Information Modeling. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 2022. 12. 40-50. DOI: 10.46338/ijetae0122_05.

Booth D. G., Fama E. F. Diversification Returns and Asset Contributions. Financial Analysts Journal, 1992, 48(3), 26–32. doi.org/10.2469/faj.v48.n3.26

Tormosov R., Chupryna I., Ryzhakova G., Pokolenko V., Prykhodko D., Faizullin A. Establishment of the rational economic and analytical basis for projects in different sectors for their integration into the targeted diversified program for sustainable energy development. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, 2021, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465993

Busse M., Dacorogna M., Kratz M. The Impact of Systemic Risk on the Diversification Benefits of a Risk Portfolio. Risks, 2014, 2(3), 260-276. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks2030260.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

BOSHTAN , A. . (2026). Identification of problems and risks in the implementation of diversification strategies under conditions of a volatile economic environment. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 1(57), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2026.57(1).64-78