System modeling of agent interactions in multi-component labor environments of the construction industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.55(3).185-199Keywords:
agent modeling, systems analysis, construction projects, work environment, interaction management, multi-component systems, simulation modeling, inspection, technical object categories, restoration work, life cycle, technical inspection, non-destructive methods, monitoring, organizational and methodological tools, extra-project influences, technical supervision, complicating factors, level of influence, constructive reliability, construction organization, organizational and technological processesAbstract
Complex labor environments in the construction industry are characterized by a multi-level structure, a significant number of interrelated participants, and the dynamic nature of processes occurring within project implementation. The efficiency of such environments largely depends on the quality of interaction organization among individual system elements, including executors, managerial staff, contractors, and other stakeholders. At the same time, each participant operates according to their own objectives, resource constraints, and behavioral strategies, which complicates coordination and decision-making processes.
The application of a systems approach combined with agent-based modeling makes it possible to reflect the internal logic of such environments, taking into account the individual characteristics of actors and their interdependencies. An agent, as a model element, is interpreted as an autonomous unit capable of decision-making, adaptation to changes, and interaction with other agents within defined rules. Model development is based on describing the structure of the environment, defining agent types, their properties, and behavioral scenarios.
Of particular importance is the ability to reproduce processes of work coordination, resource allocation, and responses to external and internal disturbances. Simulation experiments enable the evaluation of the consequences of various managerial decisions and allow the identification of the most effective configurations of interactions. This creates the preconditions for reducing risks associated with uncertainty and improving the coherence of actions among participants in the construction process.
An additional important aspect is the integration of agent-based modeling with digital construction management technologies, particularly Building Information Modeling (BIM), monitoring systems, and data analytics tools. This integration enhances model accuracy, ensures real-time updating, and forms a foundation for supporting managerial decision-making throughout all stages of the facility life cycle. In the context of the industry’s digital transformation, agent-based models serve as an effective tool for predicting the behavior of complex systems, evaluating development scenarios, and optimizing interactions among participants.
The use of a systemic agent-based approach facilitates the formalization not only of technical and economic aspects but also of organizational and behavioral dimensions of activity, including communication processes, conflicts of interest, and levels of cooperation. This provides a deeper understanding of the functioning of multicomponent labor environments and creates a methodological basis for developing adaptive management mechanisms aimed at improving the efficiency of construction project implementation.
References
Eastman C., Teicholz P., Sacks R., Liston K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. Hoboken : John Wiley & Sons, 2011. 648 p.
Eastman C. et al. Building information modeling and its impact on construction processes. Automation in Construction. 2011. 20. P. 1–9.
Wooldridge M. An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. 2nd ed. Chichester : John Wiley & Sons, 2009. 484 p.
Honcharenko, T., Chupryna, Y., Ivakhnenko, I., Zinchenco, M., Tsyfra, T.: Reengineering of the construction companies based on BIM-technology. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Res. 8(8), 4166–4172 (2020) https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/22882020.2,33
I. Chupryna, R. Tormosov, A. Aryn, M. Horbach, D. Prykhodko and M. Polzikov, "The Updated Tool for Selecting Projects for the Target Programs of Sustainable Energy Development," 2023 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), Astana, Kazakhstan, 2023, pp. 457-467, doi: 10.1109/SIST58284.2023.10223492
Karmann C., Bauman F., Raftery P., Schiavon S., Koupriyanov M. Effect of acoustical clouds coverage and air movement on radiant chilled ceiling cooling capacity. Energy and Buildings. 2018. Vol. 158. P. 939–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.046
Perera P., Nik V. M., Scartezzini J.-L., Hong T. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Applied Energy. 2020. Vol. 261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0558-0
Ma Z., Cooper P., Daly D., Ledo L. Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings. 2012. Vol. 55, Part 2. P. 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.018
ISO 52000-1:2017. Energy performance of buildings — Overarching EPB assessment — Part 1: General framework and procedures. International Organization for Standardization, 2017.
Azhar S. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering. 2011. Vol. 11(3). P. 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127
Hardin B., McCool D. BIM and Construction Management: Proven Tools, Methods, and Workflows. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing, 2015. 400 p.
Borrmann A., König M., Koch C., Beetz J. Building Information Modeling: Technology Foundations and Industry Practice. Cham : Springer, 2018. 584 p.
Cheng S., Qi Y., Wu R., Guan Y. A Multimodal Agent Framework for Construction Scenarios: Accurate Perception, Dynamic Retrieval, and Explainable Hazard Reasoning. Buildings. 2025. Vol. 15, Issue 24. Article 4439. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244439
Malykhin, M. (2025). Methodological approach to construction of a system for detection and prevention of destruction of the activities of construction participants. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(3), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-3-230-238
Liu W., Meng Q., Zhi H., Li Z., Hu X. A review of agent-based modeling in construction management: an analytical framework based on multiple objectives. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2024. Vol. 30, No. 3. P. 200–219.
https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2024.20949
Alanazi A. M. Non-destructive testing of steel-lined concrete structure using multiple agents with deep prior. Scientific Reports. 2025. Vol. 15. Article 31275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16978-3
Abdollahi-Mamoudan F., Ibarra-Castanedo C., Maldague X. P. V. Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation of Hybrid and Advanced Structures: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Emerging Trends. Sensors. 2025. Vol. 25, Issue 12. Article 3635 https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123635
Zheng Y., Wang S., Zhang P., Xu T., Zhuo J. Application of Nondestructive Testing Technology in Quality Evaluation of Plain Concrete and RC Structures in Bridge Engineering: A Review. Buildings. 2022. Vol. 12, Issue 6. Article 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060843
