Key factors determining the effectiveness of material and technical support organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2026.57(2).69-84Keywords:
material and technical support, construction logistics, supply efficiency, inventory management, procurement strategy, ERP systems, logistics risks, organizational resilienceAbstract
The effectiveness of material and technical support (MTS) organization in the construction industry is determined by a complex of interrelated production-technological, organizational-managerial, financial-economic, information-digital, and external economic factors that form a multi-level system of resource provision for construction projects. Under modern conditions of high market turbulence, rising material costs, logistical constraints, and increasing risks of supply chain disruptions, material and technical support is transforming into a strategic element of a construction enterprise’s competitiveness.
The paper generalizes the evolution of scientific approaches to the interpretation of MTS – from classical concepts of scientific management and mass production to modern logistics and digital models of supply chain management. It is substantiated that key efficiency factors include synchronization of material and production flows, optimization of procurement policy, inventory management based on economic models (EOQ, TCO), flexibility of logistics schemes, supplier diversification, and the level of digital integration of ERP, SCM, and BI analytics systems.
A classification of factors influencing the effectiveness of MTS at a construction enterprise is systematized according to functional groups: production-technological, organizational, financial, infrastructural, informational, and risk-related. It is shown that their comprehensive interaction forms an integral performance effect manifested in cost reduction, downtime minimization, increased inventory turnover, financial stability enhancement, and improved system adaptability to external shocks.
Special attention is paid to the specifics of the construction industry as a project-oriented field characterized by territorial dispersion of facilities, demand instability, and high dependence on resource flows. It is proven that under such conditions, MTS efficiency is achieved through the combination of hybrid logistics models (Push, Pull, Just-in-Time), the implementation of scenario planning, and the development of risk management systems.
The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of applying the formulated factor-based models to build an adaptive material and technical support system for construction enterprises aimed at cost minimization, increased resource efficiency, and ensured organizational resilience under conditions of market instability.
References
Taylor F. W. Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1911.
Crowther S., Ford H. My Life and Work. N.Y.: Doubleday Page & Company, 1922.
Christopher M. Logistics and Supply Chain Management. 4th Edition, London: Pearcon, 2011. 288 р.
Porter M. E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press, 1985.
Ohno T. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production. New York: Productivity Press, 1988. 176 р.
Gartner. How AI Is Transforming Supply Chain Management. URL: https://www.gartner.com/en/supply-chain/topics/supply-chain-ai
Deloitte Insights. Industry 4.0 and the Digital Twin. Manufacturing meets its match. URL: https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing-industrial-products/industry-4-0/digital-twin-technology-smart-factory.html
Forrester J. W. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1961.
Ishchenko T., Chupryna Y., Pokolenko V. The organization of biosphere compatibility construction: Justification of the predictors of building development and the implementation prospects. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2018, 7(3.2), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.2.14586
Dallasega P., Rauch E. Sustainable Construction Supply Chains through Synchronized Production Planning and Control in Engineer to Order Enterprises. Sustainability, 2017, Vol. 9, No 10: 1888. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101888
Zhao N., Ying F.J., Tookey J. Construction Procurement Selection Criteria: A Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 2022, 14(22), 15242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215242
Abdul-Rahman N., Pyeman J., Ismail N.K., Ahmad M.A. The moderating role of total cost of ownership in dynamic procurement transformation. International Journal of Education and Research, 2018, 6(5), 121-136.
Alnahhal M., Aylak B.L., Al Hazza M., Sakhrieh A. Economic Order Quantity: A State-of-the-Art in the Era of Uncertain Supply Chains. Sustainability, 2024, 16(14), 5965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145965
Tardi C. FIFO and LIFO Inventory Valuation. URL: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/060502.asp
Сікірда Ю.В., Залевський А.В. Інформаційні системи і технології в управлінні зовнішньоекономічною діяльністю: конспект лекцій. Кіровоград: Видавництво КЛА НАУ, 2013. 177 с.
Chupryna I., Ryzhakova G., Chupryna K., Biloshchytskyi A., Tormosov R., Gonchar V. Designing a toolset for the formalized evaluation and selection of reengineering projects to be implemented at an enterprise. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2022, 1(13(115), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.251235
Іванов Ю. В. Логістика у будівництві: методи прийняття рішень, особливості й перспективи розвитку. Галицький економічний вісник, 2023, № 2 (81). C. 123-132. https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2023.02
Гринів Н.Т., Равліковська А.А. Перебудова логістики в умовах воєнного стану в Україні. Академічні візії, 2022, № 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7411975
