Conceptual structure of the scientific instrumentarium for management decision support
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2026.57(2).96-109Keywords:
management decision support, conceptual structure, analytical models, procedural mechanism, digital infrastructure, systems analysis, adaptability, forecastingAbstract
The formation of a conceptual structure of the scientific instrumentarium for management decision support is a necessary condition for ensuring the systemic coherence, validity, and adaptability of modern management. Under conditions of increasing complexity of socio-economic processes, growth of information flows, and the dynamic nature of the external environment, managerial decisions must rely on integrated analytical mechanisms that combine methodological rigor, procedural consistency, and technological implementation.
The conceptual structure of the instrumentarium is considered as a multi-level system encompassing methodological, procedural, and technological segments. The methodological level defines the principles of model construction, the logic of hypothesis formulation, and the criteria for interpreting results. The procedural level ensures the transformation of primary data into structured analytical scenarios through a sequence of formalized operations. The technological level implements these mechanisms within a digital environment, providing scalability, adaptability, and high-speed information processing.
Special attention is given to the integration of different types of models – deterministic, probabilistic, and cognitive – within a unified analytical framework. Such integration enables the reproduction of both structural dependencies of the system and stochastic fluctuations, as well as cause-and-effect relationships shaping its behavior. The combination of formal mathematical methods with expert interpretation forms the foundation for a hybrid approach to decision-making.
It is substantiated that the effectiveness of the instrumentarium is determined by the structural consistency of its components, the verifiability of procedures, and the capacity for adaptive reconfiguration depending on the type of managerial task. The formalization of information transformation processes through multi-stage functions ensures the logical integrity of the analytical cycle – from data collection to the formation of managerial alternatives.
The role of the technological segment as an integration infrastructure uniting analytical platforms, simulation modules, computational cores, and visualization tools is emphasized. Its scalability and self-configurational capacity determine the overall performance level of the decision support system.
References
Chupryna I., Tormosov R., Abzhanova D., Ryzhakov D., Gonchar V., Plys N. Scientific and Methodological Approaches to Risk Management of Clean Energy Projects Implemented in Ukraine on the Terms of Public-Private Partnership. 2022 International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, 2022, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/SIST54437.2022.9945809
Poincaré H. Science and Hypothesis / WJ Greenstreet (translator). New York: Cosimo Classics, 2007. 256 р.
Wayland F. The Elements Of Political Economy. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing, 2007. 488 р.
Forrester J.W. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1961.
Ackoff R.L. The art of problem solving: accompanied by Ackoff's fables. The Statistician, 1979, 28, 230-230.
Joyner K. Systems Thinking for Leaders: A practical guide to engaging with complex problems. Queensland University of Technology, 2025. URL: https://qut.pressbooks.pub/systemcraft-systems-thinking/front-matter/preface/
Turban E. Aronson J.E., Liang T. P. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2005. 960 р.
Dhaouadi A., Bousselmi K., Monnet S., Gammoudi M.M., Hammoudi S. A Multi-layer Modeling for the Generation of New Architectures for Big Data Warehousing. In: Barolli, L., Hussain, F., Enokido, T. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99587-4_18
Liu S., Duffy A.H.B., Whitfield R.I. et al. Integration of decision support systems to improve decision support performance. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2010, 22, 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-009-0192-4
Бідюк П.І., Тимощук О.Л., Коваленко А.Є.; Коршевнюк Л.О. Системи і методи підтримки прийняття рішень. навч. посіб. Київ: КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського, 2020. 259 c.
Рижакова Г.М, Чуприна Ю.А, Гавриков Д.О, Бородавко М.В. Формування будівельного кластеру у форматі державних інвестиційних цільових програм. Шляхи підвищення ефективності будівництва в умовах формування ринкових відносин. 2019. Вип. 40. Економічний. С. 19-25. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2019.40.19-24
