New urbanism of reconstruction in a post-conflict environment: paradigms and principles of restoring the architectural fund destroyed as a result of the Russian-Ukrainian war
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2026.57(2).260-275Keywords:
reconstruction, operation, technology, housing destroyed due to Russian aggression, BIM, 3D printingAbstract
Conflict-affected cities, particularly those in Ukraine, face long-term challenges associated not only with the consequences of war but also with the need for sustainable and integrated reconstruction. The complexity of recovery processes has expanded beyond traditional issues of post-war restoration, preservation of urban heritage, and rebuilding of iconic elements of the built environment to include challenges related to decision-making efficiency, resource management, technological implementation, and financing mechanisms. These factors often lead to prolonged reconstruction cycles lacking coherent long-term planning and management. The full-scale Russian-Ukrainian war has resulted in extensive destruction of residential, public, and industrial facilities, making the prompt, high-quality, and resource-efficient restoration of infrastructure and architectural heritage a national priority. Modern reconstruction strategies increasingly rely on digital and innovative technologies, including BIM, GIS, artificial intelligence, digital twins, and additive manufacturing. However, reconstruction planning focused exclusively on urgent functional needs often leads to the neglect of New Urbanism principles, resulting in fragmented urban environments and the formation of disconnected spatial structures. This article aims to systematize global and Ukrainian paradigms, practices, and case studies of post-conflict reconstruction of destroyed architectural assets within the framework of New Urbanism principles. The methodological basis of the research includes comparative analysis of international reconstruction cases, synthesis of technological and urban planning approaches, and generalization of decision-making models applied in post-war recovery. Particular attention is given to the integration of digital technologies into sustainable urban redevelopment strategies and the preservation of urban identity. The results highlight the importance of aligning technological reconstruction processes with holistic urban development concepts, emphasizing walkability, mixed-use planning, community participation, and environmental sustainability. The proposed conceptual approach contributes to the formation of a resilient and adaptive reconstruction paradigm suitable for the restoration of Ukrainian cities affected by military aggression.
References
Tortorici, G., & Fiorito, F. (2017). Building in post-war environments. Procedia Engineering, 180, 1093-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.269
Cherkes, B., Pohranychna, I., & Rosliakov, M. (2025). Revitalization of cities damaged by Russian aggression in Eastern Ukraine. Series Architecture, 7(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.23939/sa2025.02.139
Rawat, A., Witt, E., Roumyeh, M., & Lill, I. (2024). Advanced Digital Technologies in the Post-Disaster Reconstruction Process A Review Leveraging Small Language Models. Buildings, 14(11), 3367. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113367
Zin Eddin, M. (2024). Post-War Reconstruction of Cities (Reconstruction of Baba Amr Neighbourhood in the City of Homs, Syria). Builder, 72, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4813
Moreno-Sierra, A., Pieschacón, M., & Khan, A. (2020). The use of recycled plastics for the design of a thermal resilient emergency shelter prototype. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101885
Pusceddu, C., Blumberg, G., Salvalai, G., & Imperadori, M. (2017). The use of building technology to support disaster resilience: the case study of air shelter house. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(02), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2015-0057
Montalbano, G., & Santi, G. (2023). Sustainability of temporary housing in post-disaster scenarios: A Requirement-Based Design Strategy. Buildings, 13(12), 2952. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13122952
Messaoudi, M., & Nawari, N. O. (2020). BIM-based Virtual Permitting Framework (VPF) for post-disaster recovery and rebuilding in the state of Florida. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101349
Saeed, Z. O., Almukhtar, A., Abanda, H., & Tah, J. (2021). BIM applications in post-conflict contexts: the reconstruction of Mosul city. Buildings, 11(8), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11080351
Chashyn, D., Khurudzhi, Y., & Daukšys, M. (2024). Integration of Building Information Modeling and Artificial Intelligence of Things in the Post-War Reconstruction and Renovation of Buildings. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 35(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.35.2.35160
Alsous, M. M., Scherbina, E., & Ghada, R. (2019). Advanced analysis technology in reshaping post war cities (Palmyra-Syria). IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(25), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.480
Dionisio, M. R., Kingham, S., Banwell, K., & Neville, J. (2016). Geospatial tools for community engagement in the Christchurch rebuild, New Zealand. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.007
Cinquepalmi, F., & Cumo, F. (2022). Using Digital Twin Models (DTM) for Managing, Protecting and Restoring Historical Buildings. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage, 22. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/17364
Rotilio, M., Villa, V., & Corneli, A. (2023, May). Digital Twin for a resilient management of the built environment. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment, MetroLivEnv (pp. 113-117). https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroLivEnv56897.2023.10164033
Volozhinska, O. O., & Tochenyuk, O. V. (2025). Innovative technologies for designing post-war restoration of damaged buildings. In: Proceedingss of Information technologies in the modern world: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of Higher Education Applicants and Young Scientists, April 29, 2025. Kharkiv: DBTU, 2025 (pp. 387-388).
Lavrukhina, K., Tytok, V., & Kravchuk, O. (2024). Innovative approaches and solutions of domestic construction enterprises for the restoration of post-war Ukraine. Construction Production, 77, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.36750/2524-2555.77.85-91
Fedorenko, Yu., & Sopov, V. (2022). Technology of the modular construction solution Speedstac for the restoration of destroyed housing in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Construction, 108(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.29295/2311-7257-2022-108-2-44-49
Meuser, Ph., & Markov, O. (2025). Architecture of recovery rehabilitation of war-damaged housing in Kryvyi Rih.URL: https://dom-publishers.com/products/architecture-of-recovery
Bratchuk, D. (2023, March 27). IT ready: what technologies will be useful in the reconstruction of Ukraine. URL: https://mind.ua/openmind/20255115-it-napogotovi-yaki-tehnologiyi-stanut-u-prigodi-u-vidbudovi-ukrayini
Post-war recovery: a chance for the development of the construction industry (2023, April 1). URL: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-vidbudova/3690313-povoenne-vidnovlenna-sans-dla-rozvitku-budindustrii.html
Grechukh, O. (2023, November 21). Wasteful expenditure of energy and resources. What is wrong with the reconstruction of Ukraine and what to borrow from Poland. Texty. URL: https://texty.org.ua/articles/111150/ukrayina-chy-znovu-sovok-jak-varto-zminyty-pidkhody-do-vidbudovy-i-shcho-zapozychyty-v-polshchi/?src=main
Andras, S. (2025). Building Design and Construction: An Architect’s Perspective. Wiley.
Tabbakh, Y., Rogeau, N., & Ileda, Y. (2025). Architectural Informatics as a Tool for Adaptive Reconstruction: Retrofitting Post-war Syria. In; Proceedings of the Conference ASCAAD 2025, Riyad, Saudi Arabia (pp. 356-373).
Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. (2019). Development of a benchmarking model for BIM implementation in developing countries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(4), 1210-1232. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2018-0138
Assem, A., Abdelmohsen, S., & Ezzeldin, M. (2020). Smart management of the reconstruction process of post-conflict cities. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 14(2), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2019-0099
Hadi, Z. S. (2020). A Review paper on Benefits of BIM Adoption to Improve project performance in Iraqi Construction Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 7(10), 81-108.
Hatem, W. A., Abd, A. M., & Abbas, N. N. (2018). Barriers of adoption building information modeling (BIM) in construction projects of Iraq. Engineering Journal, 22(2), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2018.22.2.59
Codarin, S. (2020). Additive Manufacturing Technologies in Restoration: An Innovative Workflow for Interventions on Cultural Heritage. Cubic Journal, 32-55. https://doi.org/10.31182/cubic.2020.3.023
Turk, A., & Weheba, G. (2024). Restoring historical buildings using additive manufacturing. The Journal of Management and Engineering Integration, 17(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.62704/10057/28081
Kaya, P. (2021). Applications of Additive Manufacturing in Construction and Historic Building Restoration / Rehabilitation. [Master’s thesis]. University of Bologna.
Rezk, J., Pons-Valladares, O., & Muñoz-Blanc, C. (2025). Evaluating Sustainability in Post-Conflict Reconstruction: A Case Study of Blast-Damaged Buildings Without Structural Collapse Risk in Syria. Buildings, 15(3), 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030369
Krasniy, E. (2024). Prospects for using AI in architectural design for the restoration of Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Design, 37, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2025.37.12
Badescu, G. (2015). Dwelling in the Post-War City Urban Reconstruction and Home-Making in Sarajevo. Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest, 4(46), 35-60. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03897-871-8-19
