Integration of development, design, construction and facility management in life cycle management of a construction project
Keywords:
development project, life cycle management, integrated approach, construction, development, facility management, operational requirements, life cycle cost, development projects, assessment of residential and public facilities, investment assessment, sustainable development, socially responsible development, investment attractiveness, building life cycle, BIM, investment efficiencyAbstract
The article examines the issue of improving the management of development construction projects based on an integrated approach to their life cycle management. It is substantiated that the traditional practice of fragmented management of individual stages – developmentt, design, construction and operation – does not ensure the achievement of the developer’s long-term goals, leads to an increase in total life cycle costs, increased risks and loss of investment attractiveness of real estate objects.The purpose of the article is to substantiate an integrated approach to life cycle management of a development construction project, which ensures the coordination of management decisions at all key stages of project implementation, taking into account the requirements of further operation. Within the framework of the study, the development project is considered as an integrated socio-economic and technical-management system focused on the formation of the long-term value of a real estate asset.The article analyzes modern scientific approaches to the management of the life cycle of construction objects, the role of the developer as an integrator of processes and stakeholders, as well as the importance of early involvement of the facility management function in the process of making management decisions. It is proven that taking into account operational requirements at the concept and design stages allows optimizing the cost of the life cycle, improving the quality of design and construction solutions, ensuring maintainability, energy efficiency and adaptability of the object to changing market conditions.Particular attention is paid to the justification of the integration of building information modeling (BIM), life cycle cost analysis approaches and facility management principles into a single development project management system. A conceptual vision of integrated management is proposed, aimed at ensuring managerial and information continuity between the stages of the life cycle of a real estate object.The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the possibility of their use by development companies to increase the efficiency of investment decisions, reduce operating costs and form competitive, sustainable and long-term attractive construction projects.
References
Chen S., Chen B. Urban energy consumption: Different insights from energy flow analysis, input–output analysis and ecological network analysis. Applied Energy. 2015. Vol. 138. P. 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.055.
Chen S., Chen B. Urban energy–water nexus: A network perspective. Applied Energy. 2016. Vol. 184. P. 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.042.
Wei T., Wu J., Chen S. Keeping track of greenhouse gas emission reduction progress and targets in 167 cities worldwide. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 2021. Vol. 3. Art. 696381. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.696381.
Teng J., Wang W., Mu X., Xu C. Assessing energy efficiency of green measures for residential buildings: the simulation case of Changchun city in China. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2021. Vol. 36. P. 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09793-x.
Ryan B.D., Gao S. Plan Implementation Challenges in a Shrinking City: A Conformance Evaluation of Youngstown’s (OH) Comprehensive Plan With a Subsequent Zoning Code. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2019, 85(4), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1637769.
Gao S., Jansen H., Ryan B. D. Demolition after decline: Understanding and explaining demolition patterns in shrinking cities. Cities. 2023. Vol. 134, 104185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104185.
Бєлєнкова О.Ю. Теоретичні передумови формування поняття «соціально відповідальний девелопмент». Шляхи підвищення ефективності будівництва в умовах формування ринкових відносин. 2018. № 38. С. 79–91. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2018.38.79-91.
Pagourtzi E., Assimakopoulos V., Hatzichristos T., French N. Real estate appraisal: a review of valuation methods. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 2003. Vol. 21, No. 4. P. 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780310483656
Arayici Y., Onyenobi T., Egbu C. Building information modelling (BIM) for facilities management (FM): The Mediacity case study approach. International Journal of 3‑D Information Modeling. 2012. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 55–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJ3DIM.2012010104.
Kshirsagar A.S., El‑Gafy M.A., Abdelhamid T.S. Suitability of life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) as asset management tools for institutional buildings. Journal of Facilities Management. 2010. Vol. 8, No. 3. P. 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961011058811.
Tsay G.S., Staub‑French S., Poirier É. BIM for facilities management: An investigation into the asset information delivery process and the associated challenges. Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12, Issue 19. Art. 9542. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199542.
Wijeratne P.U., Gunarathna C., Yang R. J., Wu P., Hampson K. BIM enabler for facilities management: A review of 33 cases. International Journal of Construction Management. 2024. Vol. 24, No. 3. P. 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2222962.
