Theoretical and methodological aspects of countercyclic management and economic security
Keywords:
social protection of the enterprise, economic cycles, cyclicality, countercyclical management, economic security, social risks, risks, economic sustainability, corporate social responsibility, personnel management, competitiveness, construction enterprises, sustainable developmentAbstract
The article provides a theoretical-methodological substantiation of social protection of the enterprise as a structural component of anti-cyclical management and a functional element of the economic security system in conditions of cyclical instability of economic development. The relevance of the study is due to the strengthening of the impact of economic downturns, crisis and transformational processes on social-labor relations, the growth of socially determined risks and the need for the formation of adaptive mechanisms of enterprise management capable of ensuring its stability and safety in the long term.The purpose of the article is the development of theoretical-methodological approaches to the interpretation of social protection of the enterprise and determination of its role in the system of countercyclical management and economic security. In the process of research, the results of domestic and foreign scientific works devoted to the problems of enterprise efficiency, corporate social responsibility, social sustainability, risk management and economic security are summarized, and the feasibility of integrating social protection into key management mechanisms is substantiated.The methodological basis of the study is a systemic, functional and risk-oriented approach, supplemented by the provisions of the theory of economic cycles and concepts of economic security of the enterprise. As a result of the analysis, it was proved that the social protection of the enterprise plays a doubly significant role: on the one hand, it acts as a tool for adapting social-labor relations to the phases of the economic cycle within the limits of anti-cyclical management, and on the other hand, it is an effective means of reducing social risks and maintaining the economic stability of the enterprise.It is justified that social protection should be considered not only as an element of the company's social policy, but as an integration mechanism that combines economic and social interests, contributes to the preservation of human capital, the reduction of internal threats and the formation of the strategic stability of the operation of the company. It was established that the inclusion of social protection in the system of anti-cyclical management allows to increase the level of management of the enterprise in the crisis phases of the economic cycle and to minimize the negative social consequences of economic downturns.The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of using the theoretical-methodological provisions of the article in the development of economic security strategies, anti-cyclical management systems, and social protection programs at the level of enterprises in various sectors of the economy.
References
Гойко А. Ф. Методичні питання оцінки ефективності роботи будівельного підприємства // Шляхи підвищення ефективності будівництва в умовах формування ринкових відносин. 2022. № 49 (1). С. 148–156. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501X.2022.49(1).148-156
Kaushik V., Walsh C. A. Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research // Social Sciences. 2019. Vol. 8, No. 9. Art. 255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Bozhanova V., Korenyuk P., Lozovskyi O. Green Enterprise Logistics Management System in Circular Economy // International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences. 2022. Vol. 7, No. 3. P. 350–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2022.7.3.024
Ohinok S., Kohut M., Kohut A. Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility in International Business // Kyiv Economic Scientific Journal. 2024. No. 4. P. 171–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2786 765X/2024 4 24
Середюк К. В. Корпоративна соціальна відповідальність будівельних підприємств: стан, тенденції розвитку та політика впровадження // Шляхи підвищення ефективності будівництва в умовах формування ринкових відносин. 2022. № 50 (2). С. 130–136. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501X.2022.50(2).130-136
Romaniuk M. D., Romaniuk T. M. Social responsibility in Ukraine: social and corporate aspects // The Actual Problems of Regional Economy Development. 2023. No. 2. P. 271–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.2.19.271 279
Сорокіна Л. В. Економетричний інструментарій управління фінансовою безпекою підприємств будівництва : монографія. 2 ге вид. / за наук. ред. Л. В. Сорокіної, А. Ф. Гойка. Київ : КНУБА, 2023. 421 с.
Loktionova Ya., Matsapura O., Moholivets A. Corporate social responsibility in the economic security system of a construction enterprise // Construction Production. 2024. No. 78. P. 103–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36750/2524-2555.78.103-109
hang Q., Oo B. L., Lim B. T.-H. Key practices and impact factors of corporate social responsibility implementation: Evidence from construction firms // Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2023. Vol. 30, No. 5. P. 2124–2154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0973
Rostamnezhad M., Thaheem M. J. Social Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review // Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14(9). Art. 5279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095279
Wang L., Zhang P., Ma L. et al. Developing a corporate social responsibility framework for sustainable construction // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2020. Vol. 26(1). P. 186–212.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.11263
Domínguez Herrera M. M., González Morales O., González Díaz E. Social Responsibility of Construction Company as Strategy for Sustainability // Construction Economics and Building. 2023. Vol. 23(1/2). https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v23i1/2.8163
